|
|
RESPONSE
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
PLAN/FOG’S/SOG’S: The
Emergency Operations Plan provides the basis for response and
short-term recovery operations. The response activities take
place initially and are designed to save lives, reduce
suffering, protect property and the environment. The short-term
recovery activities follow the response activities and are
designed to stabilize the situation and set the stage for
re-entry and recovery. National Incident Management System (NIMS)
doctrine states that the Incident Command System (ICS) is to be
used to establish command and control for the response at the
scene of all incidents. The EOP is the guide as to how the local
response to an incident will be managed. It is appropriate that
an organization utilize an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) or
a Multi-agency Coordination System depending on the size and
complexity of the event to manage the incident. The EOP should
pre-designate which organization is assigned which
responsibilities and what organization should provide
representatives to the EOC or the Multi-agency Coordination
System.
The EM Associates/EM Assist,
NIMS compliant, EOP methodology for EOP revision begins with
complete compliance of baseline federal/state/local guidance
related to EOPs. This guidance includes:
-
The
National Response Framework,
which provides the guiding principles that enable all
response partners to prepare for and provide a unified
response to disasters and emergencies – from the smallest
incident to the largest catastrophe. The
Framework
establishes a comprehensive, national, all-hazards approach
to incident response.
-
The
State Emergency Operations Plan
that adheres to the format and structure of the National
Response Plan that contains Emergency Support Functional
(ESF) Annexes and Incident Specific Annexes.
The Incident
Specific Annexes describe the concept of operations that
address specific contingency or hazard situations or an
element of an incident requiring specialized application of
the Framework.
-
The County’s Emergency
Operations Plan
defines the policies and guidelines for a County’s response
and short-term recovery and identifies the responsibilities
to prepare for, mitigate against, respond to, and recover
from threats the jurisdiction faces. The EOP also identifies
the EOC, the concept of operations, and the NIMS/ICS based
command and control structure when the EOC is activated as
part of a Multi-agency Coordination System. The EOC supports
and coordinates the field operations based on NIMS/ICS and
the EOP describes how the ESF’s support that system.
-
Functional Annexes
in either Federal ESF format or the traditional SLG-101
format, identify concepts of operations, responsible
agencies, and describe missions or responsibilities that
apply to various areas of hazard response and recovery
(i.e., transportation, law enforcement, public warning, mass
care, etc.). When applicable, functional annexes describe
the role of various support agencies in support of the lead
agency representative(s) staffing the EOC.
-
Hazard-specific Annexes
describe concepts of operation for specific hazards. They
identify strategies for detecting, assessing, controlling the
hazard, warning and protecting the public and returning the
jurisdiction to a state of normalcy. Hazard-specific annexes
identify mission considerations that will require coordination
through the EOC and the functional disciplines involved. They
also identify potential State and Federal resources that may be
needed should the hazard exceed the local capabilities.
EMERGENCY RESPONSE (CRISIS)
PLAN/SCHOOL SAFETY PLAN:
In the last decade, disasters
have affected university and college campuses with disturbing
frequency, sometimes causing death and injury, but always
imposing monetary losses and disruption of the institution’s
teaching, research, and public service. Damage to buildings and
infrastructure and interruption to the institutional mission
result in significant losses that can be measured by faculty and
student departures, decreases in research funding, and increases
in insurance premiums. These losses could have been
substantially reduced or eliminated through comprehensive
pre-disaster planning and mitigation actions. September 11, 2001
reminded everyone of the importance of taking steps to mitigate
the consequences of disasters. In the immediate aftermath of the
attacks, many higher education institutions reviewed their
disaster plans and began to reconsider issues of safety and
security. Natural and man-made disasters represent a wide array
of threats to the instructional, research, and public service
missions of higher education institutions. This document
provides planning guidance to these institutions as they prepare
to identify their risks, assess their vulnerability to natural
and man-made hazards, and develop a hazard mitigation plan. Its
purposes are to encourage higher education institutions to take
hazard mitigation seriously and to illustrate a course of action
for implementing a mitigation program to permanently reduce
vulnerability to future disasters.
EM Associates designs, develops
and delivers a comprehensive School, College, or University
Emergency Response Plan based on the FEMA “Disaster Resistant
University Guide” and the FEMA “How To” guides. The EM
Associates methodology closely follows a state or county
Emergency Operations Plan development process and fully complies
to NFPA-1600/NIMS standards.
HOSPITAL COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY
OPERATIONS PLAN: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
(JCAHO) requires each Medical Center and Community Based
Outpatient Clinic develop a comprehensive Emergency Management
Program (EMP) to minimize any disruptions to patient care
activities caused by threats and events. New JCAHO Emergency
Management Standards and the aftermath of the attacks of
September 11, 2001 require that we review and ensure an
"all-hazards" approach to emergency management.
The EMP should meet or exceed
JCAHO mandated Emergency Management Standards. These standards
need to be incorporated into a specific program suitable for
each Medical Center. As outlined below, it is possible that
multiple failures could occur, each requiring a different
response. Internal problems as well as concurrent external
failures are conceivable and require proactive and extensive
planning and preparation.
EM Associates provides a proven
process for a medical facility CEMP. The development of the
plan includes a comprehensive analysis of community hazards and
both the communities and the medical facility’s risk and
vulnerability to those hazards. This process supports hospitals
and other healthcare organizations that are adopting National
Incident Management System (NIMS) throughout their organization.
Hospital and healthcare systems are required to implement NIMS
through a phased in approach outlined in the cooperative
agreement guidance issued by the National Bio-terrorism Hospital
Preparedness Program (NBHPP).
EM Associates provides a
methodology that closely follows the Emergency Operations Plan
process for states and counties. EM Associates delivers a fully
functional EMP and contains extensive examples of plans,
policies, contingencies and solutions for problems that every
Medical Center may face. The plan will be fully compliant with
JCAHO and HICS standards. NFPA-1600 and NIMS standards will be
referenced and used to complement JCAHO and HICS.
|